November, 1933 – Oops!

SFD-Nov33-coverOne of the impressive things about Science Fiction Digest was the quality of its printing.  It was initially produced on a hand press purchased by its editor, Conrad H. Ruppert.  At that time the only practical alternative for reproducing print was the mimeograph, which often produced unreadable results.  The crisp and professional appearance created by Ruppert’s printing was likely an important factor in the notice that SFD received from the professional publishers.  Ruppert’s contributions to sci-fi fandom were widely recognized by his peers, including a tribute in the November issue of the contemporary fanzine The Fantasy Fan (below).

One nice thing about printing is that the typeset for typical pages can be reused from issue to issue.  Most of the elements of the masthead for SFD remained the same each month.  One thing that did need SFD-Nov33-cover-detailchange, however, was the date.  Unfortunately this didn’t happen with the November issue, which showed the date as October.  On all of the copies I’ve seen the error was corrected by hand, most likely by Ruppert himself.FF-Nov33-Ruppert

Another challenge faced by early fan publications was the price of paper in the height of the Depression.  This is mentioned by the editor in this issue:

The only fly in the ointment is the paper we are now using.  It is of the best grade pulp paper we could get, but it seems smooth paper is preferred… The smooth paper is so prohibitive in its cost that we could give only 8 and 12 pages of reading matter in each issue while COSMOS is running…

If the page at left from The Fantasy Fan reminds you of the look of SFD, it’s not an accident – Ruppert printed this publication also.  The Fantasy Fan was focused more on “weird” fiction and was not (at least initially) positioned as a rival to SFD.SFD-May33-ARRA

The ad at the right from the May,1933 issue will give some sense of what printing cost at the time.  ARRA Printers was Ruppert’s company, so SFD was an advertising channel as well.  A one-year subscription to SFD cost $1, the same as 100 sheets of pre-printed stationary.  Given the number of pages and the variation introduced by the Cosmos inserts, the magazine was a bargain based just on its material costs.

Julias Schwartz described the economics of the time this way in his autobiographical essay in “The Time Travelers”:

We had started by mimeographing The Time Traveler, but thanks to a fellow named Conrad H. Ruppert we were able to print some of the issues.  Ruppert offered to print our next magazine, which was called Science Fiction Digest.  It sold for a dime, twelve issues for a dollar.  A dime was a lot in those days.  You could mail a letter for two cents and ride the subway for a nickel.  You could have lunch for ten cents.  The average person was making eight to ten dollars a week.

…When our magazine was being printed it was done on separate pieces of paper, and Connie and I, and once in a while Mort, would collate and staple pages into issues.  Each of the people who were involved at the start of Science Fiction Digest contributed twenty-five dollars to begin producing and mailing the magazine.

The letters column this month sported a new masthead, with more artSFD-Nov33-Editor-Broadcasts by Clay Ferguson, Jr.

Comments about Cosmos continued in letters from readers:

Alvin M. Gaines, of Atlanta, Ga., writes in to say:
…”COSMOS appears to be giving an excellent example of the expanding universe; it’s going to expand into the first place in the classics of science fiction…

Louis C. Smith, of Oakland, Cal., who signs himself “Your Scientimaniacal correspondent” writes:
“Did I tell you that I consider COSMOS just about one of the best stf stories (as much as I’ve read) that has ever been written.  The plot is what really makes the tale though – and that seems to be what COSMOS has plenty of…”

COSMOS is good.  We all agree on that.

The editors may have lacked paper, money and experience, but enthusiasm was in ample supply.

Read Chapter Six of Cosmos.
Read about the December, 1933 issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s